Williams issued the following statement Monday:
The District Attorney’s Office must often make hard choices. The Asheville Tourists cases were first charged in August of 2013. These cases were passed by the former administration to my office for review on January 1, 2015. Upon completion of my review of these cases, in my discretion, I have elected to dismiss the charges filed against the Asheville Tourists defendants. Out of respect for the privacy of all involved I cannot comment further.
It was Bele Chere weekend when Mason and Meaux were alleged to have raped a woman at an apartment the two men shared. They were charged a week after the alleged incident. The case has lingered since.
Asheville defense attorney Al Messer, who represented Meaux, said Monday that his client “was adamaent from the beginning that he did nothing wrong.” The case lingered, though, and Messer said he and Meaux prepared to fight the charges at trial.
“We don’t know why it took as long as it did, but the new administration came along, did their own independent review and came to their conclusion that it wasn’t appropriate for prosecution,” said Messer, referring to the November election of Williams as district attorney. Williams replaced long-serving former District Attorney Ron Moore.
“We agree with that decision,” Messer continued. “He just wants the case to go away.” Messer said Meaux now lives in California, and “his baseball career is most likely over.”
Asheville defense attorney Steve Lindsay, who represented Mason in the case, said the two men cooperated fully with the investigation said he was glad to see the charges dismissed. “The charges should have been dismissed a long time ago,” Lindsay said.
“We are thankful for the result,” Lindsay added. “Unfortunately, there are some devastating consequences.”
“This is a guy whose dream was to play professional baseball, and he has probably lost his baseball career forever,” Lindsay said.
29 Comments
It is pathetic that we are only in 5th place, given our 320 million population.
If elected, I promise to produce the following:
1. Faster horses
2. Younger women
3. Older whiskey
4. More $
5. Quicker, numerous and public executions
I’m not a big horse guy, but the rest of the platform secured my vote. Hang ’em high Indie!
the headline uses the word “exonerated,” though the d.a. was very neutral in his response.
Interesting to see that Todd Williams donor, Al Messer, got his client’s rape charges dropped.
There’s also a Stephen Lindsay who gave to Todd, not sure if it’s the same guy.
Donation Record on Pages 1 and 15 of the Contribution Report: http://app.ncsbe.gov/webapps/cf_rpt_search_org/cf_report_image.aspx?DID=179045
Al Messer again, Page 2 of the Contributions Report: http://app.ncsbe.gov/webapps/cf_rpt_search_org/cf_report_image.aspx?DID=175604
All speculation, but if this is a one time thing, no one will remember in four years. If it’s not, he might lose the support of the police community heading into a future election.
Unless, of course, this is another part of the fracturing between the progressives and police forces which has been occurring for some time now.
the bigger decision yet to come is whether DA will call for the death penalty for the Codds’ murderer, Jason Owens … bigger litmus test of what we have there…
I would be shocked if he did. The death penalty doesn’t square with the progressive Utopia. We can warehouse them for life cheaper than we can kill them.
It’s comforting to know that we have a firm conservative base here who would never rush to judgment on political, social or criminal issues. They always have all the fair and balanced facts before commenting.
Don’t be a dope. “I would be shocked if he did” implies my subjective opinion. And it’s no secret that progressives hate the death penalty.
“it’s no secret that progressives hate the death penalty”
As do 82% of the countries in the world.
America is #6 in the number of people put to death by the State (2013), after The People’s Republic of China, North Korea, Iran, Iraq, and our good friends the Kingdom of Saud. Great crowd we run with…
At least we’re barely staying ahead of those bastions of civilization, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. But that’s probably just because of sheer population, not greater zeal. Damn.
bit.ly/1CGWVph
Like I said Summers, some crimes are so heinous that they must be paid for with one’s life. Two things we could do to improve the death penalty in the U.S. Extend the penalty to pedophiles. And, carry out the sentences in public. THAT’S a deterrent.
“As do 82% of the countries in the world.”
And the today’s logical fallacy IS . . .
Argumentum ad Populum.
What’s the name for the logical fallacy of pulling one line out of an argument, pretending the rest didn’t exist, and then claiming that the entire argument is false?
It’s not just the majority of peoples on the planet that have rejected the death penalty, it’s the nature of the dwindling number of countries that still practice it.
The list of countries still executing their own citizens, ranked according to the number executed in 2013:
1 People’s Republic of China
2 North Korea
2 Iran
3 Iraq
4 Saudi Arabia
5 United States
7 Somalia
8 Sudan
9 Yemen
10 Japan
11 Vietnam
12 Taiwan
13 Indonesia
14 Kuwait
15 South Sudan
16 Nigeria
17 Palestine
18 Malaysia
19 Afghanistan
20 Bangladesh
21 Botswana
22 India
How many of those countries share the language, values, standard of living, and/or predominant religions of the United States? None. All of our peers in the world community have ended the barbaric practice of the death penalty. And the few that are left are increasingly a club we shouldn’t want to belong to. That’s an argument distinct from mere numbers.
That’s a new twist from Mouthpiece: libertarians for state-mandated killing done by government bureaucrats. Expecting coherence is probably too much from him.
It’s all symbolic BS anyway: NC hasn’t executed a prisoner since 2006, and were the moratorium to end, the state would face the same problems as others in obtaining drugs, given how pharmaceutical companies don’t want to be associated with the machinery of death.
“Extend the penalty to pedophiles.”
If you truly believe that punishments actively influence the most serious crimes, then that’s the kind of deterrent more likely to encourage pedophiles to murder their victims. Some people are so motivated by medieval bloodlust that they really don’t think stuff through.
I don’t give 2 shitz what the rest of the world’s doing. As long as the majority of my fellow Americans see it my way (and they do), then it’s all good.
Execution does reduce recidivism 9 times out of 10.
True, executed criminals sometimes become a “Poltergeist” which is an even worse problem.
Well this is all a very comforting comment section so far. District attorney concludes there isn’t enough of a case to charge someone with rape, and the immediate reaction is “Well why not? We wanted to convict them anyway!” Class act, guys…
Agree 100%. Haven’t we learned anything from recent false rape claims?
The words in between your quotes appear absolutely nowhere in the comments section.
“A dropped hot potato is still hot…”
“I’m not sure exonerated is the word I would use…”
Well what word would you use? You are *innocent* until proven guilty. That is how justice works in this country. These guys are no more guilty of rape than you or I are, and yet the attitude is one of “Well…maybe the *court* doesn’t think they’re guilty…but they can’t stop us from thinking they are.”
Which is true, you can’t legislate public opinion, but the ethical approach is to give people the benefit of doubt. If a DA doesn’t believe there’s even enough there to bother taking something to trial, then there’s very likely nothing there.
Dropped doesn’t mean “innocent.” A dropped “hot potato” is still “hot.”
Interesting peek inside the progressive mind: guilty until proven falsely accused by criminal female and then, still guilty, if not moreso.
I guess it’s all about the ‘larger truth.’
Know the accuser. Quite offensive using such a description not knowing anything about the person, or really the details of the case.
Shouldn’t the accuser be charged?
Excuse me?
WHY?
“why” what? …
Not sure if “exonerated” is the word I’d use here.
Could just go by what the DA said—-he dismissed the charges, a fairly neutral comment. He didn’t exonerate anyone, nor did he say there wasn’t enough evidence to convict, which would have implied guilt.